|back to main board||collapse thread|
|A runaway process (15/03/21 22:31:58)||Reply|
It looks like a runaway process.
If this phenomenon is unique to the AZ vaccine, it will be withdrawn because the competitors are better. Possibly it will be dumped cheap in less discerning markets than Europe, where it undoubtedly will save thousands of more lives than it is going to take.
Ugly. Time will show.
|An afterthought (15/03/21 22:51:42)||Reply|
If I were a regulator, I would have taken a closer look at the dose finding studies of the vaccine.
|Re: An afterthought (17/03/21 06:56:57)||Reply|
It is very unlikely that the injection goes intravenously. But if it does, it might be held back by the lungs, or some of it might pass to the arterial side of the heart and get distributed with arterial blood to wherever. Or - if there is shunting in the heart - like a minimally patent foramen ovale - some might enter the arterial system without passing the lungs. So the substance might settle in small vessels and initiate clotting by producing antigen in places where it induces clotting and where clotting becomes a runaway process. Not like in the deltoid, where it is confined to the muscle and any clotting can be limited and harmless.
Statistics and epidemiology cannot explain rare events.
|Investigation (AstraZeneca vaccine) (20/03/21 09:39:37)||Reply|
I learnt from another source that the clinical picture of the victims was - unusual - if there is such a term. The victims had thrombosis of venous sinuses of the cranium
and in deep abdominal veins.
Venous thrombosis is most commonly associated with leg muscles, extending into the pelvis.
Now even the UK has reported such cases, even though they denied seeing them at first. It is explainable: Vaccines have been inject-and-forget types of drugs, in contrast to other drugs, where there is follow-up by the prescriber. It is typical that the Norwegian cases were previously completely healthy health personnel, with a short communication pathway to the reporting system.
A serious vaccine manufacturer with a long-term commitment would already be in the process of refining the composition of the vaccine to eliminate the danger hotspots of the antigen RNA.
It bring to mind a side effects emergency of the nineteen-seventies. I was a student when Eraldin (practolol) was launched as the first cardioselective beta blocker - by ICI, later known as Zeneca. It was withdrawn from the marked because of severe rashes in the palms of the hands, and destruction of tear glands and maybe salivary glands IIRC. In the wake of this withdrawal, two new cardioselective betablockers were introduced: ICI's Tenormin (atenolol) and Astra's Seloken (metoprolol). They were competing fiercely, and there was a balance for many years. One Astra representative leactured at a congress that Astra had synthesized practolol at an early stage, but decided not to follow it up because they saw one side chain details as a possible focus of dangerous metabolic activation. Just rearranging a few atoms eliminated the reactivity, and metoprolol is still going strong. The Astra people (Swedes) obviously were better at drawing board toxicology than their UK competitors.
A university is not set up to maintain a product. Academics are set up to publish - or to say it irreverently: they go for likes and get rewarded for likes. If I were to choose a partner for vaccine development, I would rather choose a startup with good people than a university institute. The culture is widely different.
|When? (20/03/21 10:12:40)||Reply|
Will they open-source it?
|Opensourcing when there is $ to be made? (07/04/21 10:53:36)||Reply|
The Oxford start-up, co-founded by Sarah Gilbert, who led the development of the AstraZeneca vaccine, could price its offering as early as this month, according to people familiar with the matter. Vaccitech declined to comment."
|Re: Opensourcing when there is $ to be made? (11/04/21 09:46:24)||Reply|
|An interesting question. (29/04/21 17:28:21)||Reply|
License fees will still be a possibility. Building factories, teaching personnel. Profits, but not windfall profits.
|Off/on topic: Xenotransplants (20/04/21 08:49:40)||Reply|
I admit that I am far behind on this topic: I read up on it about 20 years ago when I had my compulsory year of internal medicine together with some of the now famous people.
If you wish to genetically modify a pig to deliver kidneys for transplantation into humans, the first thing to be tried and tested was tissue compatibility antigens: change them from those of the porcine species to the human variety. First, of course, they tested the principle - harmonising HLA and blood type between donor and recipient, then transplanting. Wht could go wrong when the targets for the immune reactions were taken away?
What happened, was that the tranplant triggered the coagulation system of the recipient, so the donated organ clogged almost instantly.
So - what does this vector do with the levels of coagulation activation in the recipient? Tests have shown an increasing bleeding tendency in recipients of the AZ vaccine, suggesting that a subclinical event related to the catastrophic clogging is far more common than the clinical cases leading to death.
If this is even remotely relevant, it might mean that the Janssen vaccine may have a future even if the AZ vaccine will have to be scrapped (eventually). But in countries heavily hit by the virus the risk of the AZ vaccine seems minimal compared to the dangers associated with living inside a cloud of infectious material, such as in the slums of big cities.
|Re: Off/on topic: Xenotransplants (20/04/21 13:45:25)||Reply|
|Scrapped or "scrapped"? (29/04/21 16:36:30)||Reply|
The Norwegian deaths were healthy health personnel with an excellent prognosis if they were to be infected. So they were vaccinated mainly to protect others.
|magneovaxx (22/07/21 18:52:39)||Reply|
STUDY ON THE ELECTROMAGNETISM OF VACCINATED PERSONS IN LUXEMBOURG
"It was found that vaccinated individuals do give off an electromagnetic field and that the earlier the individuals were vaccinated, the stronger the field they gave off. This sensation and appraisal, which is purely a tactile experience when the shoulder magnet is applied and removed, should be verified much more accurately with much more precise equipment.
It was extremely difficult to find individuals willing to play along with this extremely disorienting experiment.
Individuals are interested in the experiment out of curiosity and then when they see that the magnet clings onto their skin, they become dubious at first, then they suddenly become cold. Some of them even become extremely nervous, even completely shocked.
During the exchanges, people clearly express their dismay by saying afterwards that they are taken as hostages. Many acknowledge that this injection is non-consensual and that at no time were they given rational explanations, even if only from the point of view of the benefit/risk balance. After reflection and discussion, they then describe this act as: "mistake, madness, loophole, solution, or even blackmail".
These exact terms were used frequently.
The survey is stopped for reasons of conscience and morals because the investigator is no longer able to cope with the helplessness of people whose faces become petrified when they realise that they have been injected with a substance of which they know nothing.
The investigator, who has studied management techniques and psychosociology in the past,is very uncomfortable with these people who are wondering what is happening to them.
People become pale, white, nervous, put a hand to their forehead or cross their arms and pinch their bottom lip. Some sweat from their hands as they are seen wiping them on their hips or thighs.
These effects and expressions usually occur in states of anxiety, extreme stress or really measurable tension.
For the respondents, these uncontrolled physical manifestations are indicative of a deep malaise when they realise afterwards that they may have done something irreparable.
The act of vaccination being an irreversible act."
if you're aware of the danger of high frequency alternating electromagnetic fields are to the normal human body one can only imagine the effect on these newly magnetized test subjects.
let alone the cytotoxicity of the s1 spike protein and it's synthetic mRNA delivery mechanism:
everyone here used to be skeptics... has 30 pieces of silver changed that for many?
|dr yeadon (22/07/21 20:20:59)||Reply|
|the injected (04/08/21 23:37:34)||Reply|
Experimentation is numerated just behind Murder in the list.
All the deaths of the experimented upon are Murder, as well.
|This board has been visited 47799 times||Current time is 05/08/21 18:52:14|